ODE (Finally) Uses "Quality" to Describe School Choices.

The Ohio Department of Education has a section of its website devoted to school choice. Traditionally, that has been called simply "School Choice". Here's a screen shot of that tab, which has been used for years and was captured by the Wayback Machine on April 6.

Here's the new screen:

Now changing the name of Ohio's school choice options doesn't actually make them quality. As I've been talking about here and here, Ohio's charter schools just aren't up to snuff. But the fact that ODE has finally adopted the language of the quality-focused charter school community is a hopeful sign that better things are to come. And, perhaps, Senate Bill 148 has a better shot of remaining largely intact than we all originally thought.

Here's hoping.

Ohio Charters Just Don't Work, Part II

Yesterday, I went over how charter failures hurt kids in local school districts, as well as how much worse Ohio charters perform compared with those districts. Today, I'm going to deal with some of the excuses for charter school failures.

Claim: Charter schools struggle because their populations are so much more challenging than districts'.

Fact: While charter schools do have higher percentages of students in poverty and minorities, they have smaller percentages of special education children.

But here's the deal: Charters do worse on the report card than districts with greater challenges. So that means that while charters' poor performance compared with districts overall can perhaps be explained by more challenging populations, districts with greater challenges are doing better. So charters are not, on the whole, doing a better job serving our state's most challenging students than districts with more challenges than the charter faces.

Here are the performance comparison between charters and districts with greater percentages of poverty, special education and minorities.

In every category, districts with higher percentages of poverty, special education and minorities have a greater percentage of As, Bs and Cs.

So, again, charter schools do have higher percentages of these challenging populations than districts overall, except special ed where the typical Ohio district has a higher percentage. But even districts that are facing greater challenges, Ohio districts outperform charter schools and their less challenging populations of students.

Claim: Charter schools should be only compared with Ohio's urban districts because they have similar populations.

Fact: Ohio's urban districts face greater challenges than Ohio's charter schools. Here are the percentages of poverty, special education and minorities in both sectors:

As you can see, charters have slightly higher poverty rate, but far fewer special education children and far fewer minorities than the urban districts.

Yet despite urban districts' greater overall challenges, urban districts actually score higher on the state's proficiency metric -- the Performance Index Score, which is most influenced by demographic challenges.

In addition, 45% of the children in Ohio charter schools do not come from the state's urban core. So it is not really fair to compare overall charter performance, only 55% of which comes from the state's urban core, with the overall performance in the state's urban core.

Tomorrow: Even building-level data shows that Ohio's public schools do better

Ohio Charters Just Don't Work, Part I

Over the last month or so, I have been busily compiling data and reports for Know Your Charter -- reports I frankly hoped would give, well, hope to the idea that Ohio charter schools shouldn't be a national joke. I'm embarrassed that my state's education system -- any part of it -- is subjected to ridicule and scorn. I know Ohio's a great place to live and raise a family. But all the data -- and I mean all the data -- demonstrate emphatically that Ohio's charter school system overall is the exact "debacle" national observers have claimed. But it's not just a debacle for kids in charters. It's also really bad for kids who aren't in charters -- a story not often told, let alone known.

Over the next few days, I will sift through the data for you to emphatically demonstrate the problem Ohio has, its scope and, ultimately, solutions that can make Ohio a leader on high-quality charter schools, not the state where quality goes to die.

Today represents Part I of this effort.

For the last three years at Innovation Ohio, we have written reports based on state data that looked at how much money and how many students went from which districts to which charters. The results the previous two years showed that far more kids go to poorer performing charters than better performing charters. Well, this year (which we posted at Know Your Charter) was no different, except for the scale. Now the amount of money going to worse-performing charters is more than $430 million, and if you include charters that perform the same, it's now more than $500 million that goes from the same or higher-performing districts to the same or worse-performing charters.

Here is what the data show:

1. Out of the $774 million that were transferred from districts to charters with state report card grades , 56% – or more than $430 million – went to charter schools that performed worse overall than the district that transferred the money. If you include districts that performed the same, nearly 2 out of every 3 dollars went to charter schools from a district that performed the same or better, at a cost of $504 million.
2. Local taxpayers had to subsidize $180.3 million to cover the money transferred to the same or worse performing charter schools.
3. Districts were more likely to lose money to charters that underperformed on all 8 report card categories and not a single transfer occurred where the charter outperformed the district on all 8 report card grades.
4. When districts and charters were both graded in every category, 97% of the time districts outperformed the charters. Just 1.8% of the time did a charter outperform districts in the majority of the categories.
5. There were 461 school districts – accounting for more than ¾ of all of Ohio school districts – where all the kids attending charter schools were transferred to equal or poorer performing charter schools. That adds up to 19,042 kids and $136.6 million. Meanwhile, every district lost at least some funding to poorer performers, with only 17 districts losing less than half their children to poorer performing charters.
6. In 84 of 88 counties, more than half of children attended poorer performing charters, and in 43 of Ohio’s 88 counties, all the children going to charters attend charters that perform the same or worse than local school districts.

Here it is in a pie chart. You can see just how much money goes to worse-performing charters. It's not good, especially because charters have been sold as higher quality options for parents and kids. In Ohio, they generally are not.

What's even more amazing is when you see how many times the transfers went to worse-performing charters.

This means that nearly 5000 times, the transfers (which means all kids going from a district to a charter, whether that's 1 or 1000) went to worse-performing charters. And, more importantly, look at how many kids go to worse performers:

This is not good. But don't worry, it's worse than it looks. That's because the funding that follows these children to worse-performing charters means that districts have less state funding to educate the children who remain in the school district. That means one of two things: Districts become more reliant on local property taxes, which is unconstitutional, or, as happens in 86 Ohio school districts, every kid loses funding, even including local taxes. Here are the top 25 districts that lose overall per pupil funding because charters take so much more than the state would have given the districts for the same kid that not even the district's local revenue can make up the difference:

And here are the top 25 districts whose state share drops the most because of the charter deduction. In other words, these are the districts who could make the strongest argument that charters cause a greater "overreliance on property tax" -- a no-no, according to the Ohio Supreme Court.

As you can see, charter funding has a profound impact on funding for kids in school districts. The great, untold story of the Ohio charter school experience has been its effect upon the 90% of kids who are not in charter schools. This funding system is a major problem. And despite the fact that the charter school reform measures currently pending in the Ohio General Assembly are strong and (especially Senate Bill 148) historic, the fact that they do not deal with funding reform leaves a gaping hole in Ohio's charter structure -- a hole that must be filled, not just hidden with good camouflage.

Tomorrow: Ohio Charters Just Don't Work, Part II: Charter school excuses debunked