So, despite having more than half their buildings with, for all intents and purposes, all their kids economically disadvantaged, Ohio's Big 8 urban buildings actually perform better, on average, than Ohio's Charter Schools, which were originally intended to "save" children from "failing" urban buildings.
I'm not saying I'm happy with the Big 8 results. What I am saying is the Big 8, despite their struggles, are doing better with more challenges than Ohio's Charter Schools. $914 million should buy us taxpayers more, I think.
Building Type
|
% Economically Disadvantaged
Per Building
|
% of Schools
>95% Economically Disadvantaged
|
Average Performance
Index Score
|
Big 8
|
86.5%
|
51.0%
|
79.08
|
Charter
|
81.9%
|
38.2%
|
78.058
|